Quote:
|
Originally Posted by busyrobot
I am not going to turn this into a big point by point bash. Well, more accurately, I am not going to let it continue as one. I am telling you - regardless of how you see yourself - you were for good cause on both Zoe and my last nerve because of your constant distruptive behavior, you can ask yourself why that was or you can continue to blame both of us as being ignorant.
|
Nor am I, I'm merely defending myself against lies presented on the forums.
You've failed to realise that I've done NOTHING to you or Zoe on such a scale that your hair would grow grey and your head would explode. I've asked you both logical questions in which the only defense you have against me is generating lies and otherwise defaming me with ill-words that lack sense.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by busyrobot
As to the best king of Dustari, most people feel that was Aftershock, from what I hear. I was in Dustari for one day before he resigned, I wish I had a chance to have gotten to known him.
|
Indeed, Dustari would've been a better place. None the less revolutions are apart of Dustarian life as that's the only way things can change.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by busyrobot
If you want to try to make an honest attempt of working with Dustari, then by all means start now. If you can just once and for all just let all those little points where you feel you are right go by, and actually set aside the differences we have (such as, accept you'll be working to help a kingdom that is allied with the contemporary Zormite) then we can move ahead.
|
I believe yourself and Zoe have observed how when I join a kingdom I quickly gain power and clout. I also think that you believe if I were to actually be given a position of power in Dustari that you would hold the title of King for only a short time.
The Zormite issue would be fine by me if they would just change their name (Archigos Republic)... it's not that hard, honestly.
I'll just quote Sun Tzu here, "If you know yourself and if you know your enemy then you will win the battle". The concept is present here. We both believe truely in what we say, ergo understandings wont come until someone folds.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by busyrobot
Otherwise, Dustari will have to move on without you, and if you have rejected the way she is - that is your call. I can't tell you to do otherwise, but you can't play both sides anymore. Either work towards making Dustari better or just acknowledge you have chosen not to associate at all with us. You don't have to be on the member list of a kingdom to be a part of helping it, but you can't just sit around and critize all the time. You have to be constructive.
|
Dustari has already moved on without me. And being Anti-Zoe is Pro-Dustari in my opinion, also in the opinions of some others. Just because I dont agree with you on how Dustari should be run doesn't mean I'm "playing both sides".
I've already given you suggestions.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by busyrobot
If you can do that, we have the possibility of perhaps working towards some of the same goals. I have never been critical of someone - no matter how beligerent they have been in the past - when they make a constructive suggestion...even if I don't agree with whatever is suggested.
|
You was very critical against me when I was conquering Samurai and Dustari.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by busyrobot
Either you think its worth it or you don't, so make a choice one way or the other and lets move on.
|
Yet again, dont want to sound too arrogant. But just in my own opinion I believe you should be happy to have my interest to assist Dustari. Look at my previous history. I've gone into kingdoms where the average playercount was about three, then I quickly evolved those kingdoms into 100+ top notch RPers. Then I always end up conquering the world with excellent diplomacy and warring skills.
It's one of those things like, I can be with you or against you.