Quote:
|
Originally Posted by busyrobot
You can't reply to it, you're arguments have fully broken down and you are left only with weak insults.
Except that in this case, I am saying 2+2=4. Get your math right 
Never said they weren't.
All I said, is that when you have a discrepency that occured years ago, and the only way to fix that discrepency is to create a new one now of at least equal size, it is better - since you'll have one either way - to leave the discrepency in the past instead of create a new one that messes up current affairs. |
The fact of the matter is this, I've already ANSWERED your "arguements" (if that's what you want to call them) and you're just filibustering now.
My arguements have not been broken down, I'm just not going to repeat myself to bicker over the internet.