Graal Forums

Graal Forums (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/index.php)
-   Graphic Design (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=9)
-   -   Finger (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=84468)

Packratia 03-03-2009 03:10 AM

Finger
 
1 Attachment(s)
Graal needs more of my awesome art. so here it is. a photorealisitic finger

kia345 03-03-2009 03:17 AM

Diglett's nose is huge

MagikMasterMind 03-03-2009 03:22 AM

It's not the kind of pixel art we see everyday.. and I sort of like it. :)

Elk 03-03-2009 05:20 AM

That style is the infamous Oekaki :p Sketch-Pixelstyle
Not very valued in the pixelscene, most people don't even consider it as pixelart

Liberated 03-03-2009 08:04 AM

i think that is because you normally carefully place each pixel with pixelart, with this sketchy stuff you don't,
i like it tho!

Codein 03-04-2009 04:37 PM

Looking good! Looks more like a toe though. For my recommendation, I think you need to make the nail look more like a tail. It looks like it's been taken off.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Elk (Post 1470829)
Not very valued in the pixelscene, most people don't even consider it as pixelart

Sorry but where and when did he say it was pixel art? This forum doesn't have "Pixel Art" written in it's description at all.

Quote:

or YOUR style?
However, I do notice the above written in it's description.

Crow 03-04-2009 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Codein (Post 1471282)
Sorry but where and when did he say it was pixel art? This forum doesn't have "Pixel Art" written in it's description at all.

He just explained Oekaki a bith further.

Codein 03-04-2009 05:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crow (Post 1471294)
He just explained Oekaki a bith further.

I don't think there was any need to say that it wasn't pixelart. I know it isn't pixel art, you know it isn't pixel art, I'm sure the guy who made it knows it isn't pixel art.

To be quite fair, we know that he's looking down on it, as per usual.

Crow 03-04-2009 05:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Codein (Post 1471299)
I don't think there was any need to say that it wasn't pixelart. I know it isn't pixel art, you know it isn't pixel art, I'm sure the guy who made it knows it isn't pixel art.

To be quite fair, we know that he's looking down on it, as per usual.

It's an interpretation issue. I still consider it pixel art, although it is sketchy. If you would be that strict with bordering the pixel art term, you could also say that pieces which were created using floodfills are not pixel art anymore.

Codein 03-04-2009 06:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crow (Post 1471313)
It's an interpretation issue. I still consider it pixel art, although it is sketchy. If you would be that strict with bordering the pixel art term, you could also say that pieces which were created using floodfills are not pixel art anymore.

True. Very true. However, I'd say it was a sketch using 1-px pencil tool. Does a sketch with a 3-pixel pencil tool still qualify as pixel art? What's your definition of pixel art, exactly?

Crow 03-04-2009 07:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Codein (Post 1471333)
True. Very true. However, I'd say it was a sketch using 1-px pencil tool. Does a sketch with a 3-pixel pencil tool still qualify as pixel art? What's your definition of pixel art, exactly?

I don't have an exact definition. It is too much to cover anyway. I would still say it's pixel art if he'd have used a 3px brush though.

Soala 03-06-2009 09:41 PM

I'd so want to get wild on this and make it crazy like CORN IS MADE OF CORN thread...
Too bad, can't draw atm ^^


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 08:51 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright (C) 1998-2019 Toonslab All Rights Reserved.