Graal Forums

Graal Forums (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/index.php)
-   Classic Main Forum (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=175)
-   -   Classic Supporters Banner (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=82873)

Umat 11-23-2008 02:27 AM

Classic Supporters Banner
 
I made this banner because I support Classic. And I just want to tell you that you can use it as well if you'd like.

Big banner:
http://www.42chan.com/classic_graal.png
[IMG]http://www.42chan.com/classic_graal.png[/IMG]

Small banner:
http://www.42chan.com/classic_graal2.png
[IMG]http://www.42chan.com/classic_graal2.png[/IMG]

knightfire35 11-23-2008 04:06 AM

Very nice, I will certainly use it.

Nataxo 11-23-2008 08:19 AM

I dont play Classic :(

I neve rmade it past the nooby island... all the cool kids where at the other side laughing at me :cry:

Umat 11-23-2008 08:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nataxo (Post 1444225)
I dont play Classic :(

I neve rmade it past the nooby island... all the cool kids where at the other side laughing at me :cry:

Just ask anyone that's online and they'll probably help. :)

maximus_asinus 11-23-2008 09:37 AM

What are you supporting anyways? Your banner is unclear. Which generation of Classic are you supporting. Or are you not supporting the server, just the idea of a Classic Graal?

Umat 11-23-2008 09:51 AM

Just supporting the server. Sure I liked it better pre-npcserver but that's not coming back, so why not cheer on the dev team to actually progress in their work towards something similiar to old classic. In other words "Supporting the idea of Classic Graal"

DustyPorViva 11-23-2008 10:05 AM

A little too big for my tastes.

Darklux 11-23-2008 01:51 PM

Nice banner, though content and players are probaply more important to classic atm.

DrakilorP2P 11-23-2008 02:59 PM

Too big for the tastes of any rational man.

Soala 11-23-2008 03:52 PM

Agree'd

Crimson2005 11-23-2008 05:41 PM

Oh god rofl

Umat 11-23-2008 08:02 PM

I could make a smaller version. :P

Soala 11-23-2008 08:46 PM

Go on. ^^

Umat 11-23-2008 09:01 PM

http://www.42chan.com/classic_graal2.png
So what do you think?

Nabru 11-25-2008 05:37 PM

1 Attachment(s)
imo.

grim_squeaker_x 11-25-2008 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nabru (Post 1444715)
imo.

Notice that the banner says Classic Graal and not Graal Classic.

Umat 11-25-2008 06:40 PM

I would have wrote "Old Graal: The Adventure" but it looks wrong and it took to much space.

Maybe I could revise it and do a "I support Tyhm's Classic".

EDIT:
It would help if someone could bring me a screenshot of a particular part that's known to be Tyhm's work.

DrakilorP2P 11-26-2008 06:17 PM

I made a better version.

I support Classic Graal.

It's smaller, subtler and consequentially more pleasing to the eyes of your reader. It's also dynamic in that you can change the text as you see fit.

Plus it's only 65 bytes of data, as opposed to 27355 bytes.

jacob_bald6225 11-26-2008 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DrakilorP2P (Post 1444848)
I made a better version.

I support Classic Graal.

It's smaller, subtler and consequentially more pleasing to the eyes of your reader. It's also dynamic in that you can change the text as you see fit.

Plus it's only 65 bytes of data, as opposed to 27355 bytes.

When mostly everyone viewing this forum has broadband and there is free web hosting you have to be a complete **** to make an argument about file sizes.

Crono 11-26-2008 08:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jacob_bald6225 (Post 1444859)
you have to be a complete **** to make an argument about file sizes.

It is Drakilor you're responding to afterall...

maximus_asinus 11-27-2008 07:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nabru (Post 1444715)
imo.

Now thats something I can get behind!

WhiteDragon 11-27-2008 07:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DrakilorP2P (Post 1444848)
I made a better version.

I support Classic Graal.

It's smaller, subtler and consequentially more pleasing to the eyes of your reader. It's also dynamic in that you can change the text as you see fit.

Plus it's only 65 bytes of data, as opposed to 27355 bytes.

I wonder if that warrants having I support Classic Graal. in your signature 420 times.

grim_squeaker_x 11-27-2008 10:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WhiteDragon (Post 1445049)
I wonder if that warrants having I support Classic Graal. in your signature 420 times.

lol

DarkReaper0 11-27-2008 06:21 PM

Finally something to symbolize how much we miss when it didn't suck.

Cause Supported.


Start a cult and we'll see who the crazy New Graal people are, and we'll start the genocides!


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 11:28 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright (C) 1998-2019 Toonslab All Rights Reserved.