Graal Forums - Strafe [could be used as a shield block]

Graal Forums (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/index.php)

- Code Gallery (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=179)

- - Strafe [could be used as a shield block] (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=74273)

xAndrewx

05-29-2007 06:48 PM

Strafe [could be used as a shield block]

Well, here's a stafe thing.

HTML Code:

//#CLIENTSIDE

function onCreated()

{

  movement = this;

}



public function onStaticDirection(newDirection)

{

  if (playerDirection != temp.newDirection)

  {

    playerDirection = temp.newDirection;

  }

  if (keydown2(160, true) && playerShield)

  {

    setani("c_shieldblock", "");

    player.dir = playerDirection;

    scheduleevent(0.05, "StaticDirection", playerDirection);

  }

   else

  {

    playerShield = false;

  }

}

How it's called

HTML Code:

//#CLIENTSIDE

function onKeyPressed(letterCode)

{  

  switch(temp.letterCode)

  {

    case 160:

      playerShield = true;

      movement.onStaticDirection(player.dir);

    return true;

  }

}

Advise, make all the keyPressed actions all in one weapon, and then just send it through there

cbk1994

05-31-2007 01:38 AM

Make sure you add a a break in that case 160:

Few things that could work only on your server though.

Otherwise nice, I never realised you could do movement = this; on clientside, and then call it from other weapons!

xXziroXx

05-31-2007 01:39 AM

Uhm..

PHP Code:


		
			
movement = this;

That looks retarded. Why not just name the wNPC to "movement" and do movement.SomeFunctionHere() ?

cbk1994

05-31-2007 01:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xXziroXx (Post 1313560)

Uhm..

PHP Code:


		
			
movement = this;

That looks retarded. Why not just name the wNPC to "movement" and do movement.SomeFunctionHere() ?

How so?

Notice this is in the code gallery, so people using it might not have custom Q Menus.

In that case, it could be deleted! That would be bad :(
There's nothing wrong with what xAndrewx did... I like it.

Better than doing

( @ "-System/Movement" ).doSomething();

xXziroXx

05-31-2007 01:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cbkbud (Post 1313563)

I like it.

Good for you! I don't though.

cbk1994

05-31-2007 01:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xXziroXx (Post 1313566)

Good for you! I don't though.

Why not? It seems perfectly logical to me.

xAndrewx

05-31-2007 10:44 AM

I don't use break, as it would carry on with the script. Calling return just stops the function at hand.

cbk1994

05-31-2007 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xAndrewx (Post 1313721)

I don't use break, as it would carry on with the script. Calling return just stops the function at hand.

It's probably a better practice to always break; at the end of the switch, then use return. Personal preference I suppose though.

All times are GMT +2. The time now is 03:44 PM.