Graal Forums

Graal Forums (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/index.php)
-   Level Design (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   A level.. (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=68639)

DarkIceX 09-09-2006 06:19 PM

A level..
 
God, I haven't posted a level on here since... '01 or '02.. Well, rate this level 1-10 and tell me how I can improve. :O

http://img387.imageshack.us/img387/8...icslvl2ea0.png

zim5354 09-09-2006 11:40 PM

ugly house :( i dont like it.

D4rKv310c1ty 09-10-2006 01:20 AM

Grass detail & etc is fab, house is different but I reckon I could like that.

k0rupt_ed 09-10-2006 03:57 AM

I agree I like the landscape, not the house.

Magadal 09-10-2006 10:21 AM

I like both. House looks cool.

Crono 09-10-2006 02:22 PM

That detail reminds me A LOT of my own. Were you inspired by me XD?

Also overall it's a decent level just fix that ugly house. :(

Hitmanjack 09-12-2006 02:00 AM

Looks good. Very "stereotypical" outside?

TpH 09-12-2006 02:56 PM

I think it looks good, simple is good - at times.

Shaun 09-12-2006 10:21 PM

Oh hey, the dirt path is actually logical. I applaud that. It's difficult to maintain logic in the NewMain style. You've done a good job making the fenceposts not random either, but marking along the road.

The trees, I like. Keeping it varied but plentiful.

This is, technically, one of the best levels presented in the NewMain style that I have seen, however it is not without it's flaws.

You have the house path stones strewn about at random seeming to follow no order or rationality.

The house itself looks insufficient as a dwelling. I like how you tried new things, but the building itself looks incomplete and rehashed from a style that has been inferior all along.

The grass/botanical detailing could be said to be inconsistent, but as is nature, so I'll excuse that in my grading.

Again, this is one of the better technically done NewMain style levels. Really, keeping the logical with the NewMain is mostly well done here. Keep refining this with experience, and you'll produce some of the best technical levels for all of Graal.

With the house? Scratch that style. There's not much you can do when the foundation of that style of house is weak to begin with.

My overall grade: B+

You demonstrate a good understanding of tiling/level theory and a lot of potential to take it far as long as you keep practising.

D4rKv310c1ty 09-18-2006 12:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shaun
Oh hey, the dirt path is actually logical. I applaud that. It's difficult to maintain logic in the NewMain style. You've done a good job making the fenceposts not random either, but marking along the road.

The trees, I like. Keeping it varied but plentiful.

This is, technically, one of the best levels presented in the NewMain style that I have seen, however it is not without it's flaws.

You have the house path stones strewn about at random seeming to follow no order or rationality.

The house itself looks insufficient as a dwelling. I like how you tried new things, but the building itself looks incomplete and rehashed from a style that has been inferior all along.

The grass/botanical detailing could be said to be inconsistent, but as is nature, so I'll excuse that in my grading.

Again, this is one of the better technically done NewMain style levels. Really, keeping the logical with the NewMain is mostly well done here. Keep refining this with experience, and you'll produce some of the best technical levels for all of Graal.

With the house? Scratch that style. There's not much you can do when the foundation of that style of house is weak to begin with.

My overall grade: B+

You demonstrate a good understanding of tiling/level theory and a lot of potential to take it far as long as you keep practising.

Just why... WHY do you have to detail your comments on it? If you really have alot to say just bullet point it, because in every level post i've seen i've just seen LONG posts from you and I don't even bother to read them because they're so long and tedious!

Shaun 09-18-2006 02:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by D4rKv310c1ty
Just why... WHY do you have to detail your comments on it? If you really have alot to say just bullet point it, because in every level post i've seen i've just seen LONG posts from you and I don't even bother to read them because they're so long and tedious!

Are you allergic to words?

I am confident that my post, even if too long for your attention span (limit at 100 words?), is much more constructive than "Grass detail & etc is fab, house is different but I reckon I could like that."

WanDaMan 09-21-2006 07:51 PM

Very impressive, I really like it.

zim5354 09-22-2006 12:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by D4rKv310c1ty (Post 1219164)
Just why... WHY do you have to detail your comments on it? If you really have alot to say just bullet point it, because in every level post i've seen i've just seen LONG posts from you and I don't even bother to read them because they're so long and tedious!

I like them, they help people.

MysticX2X 09-22-2006 02:39 AM

Details pretty good, not a big fan of the house. And on one of those trees, the side is cut off a bit.

D4rKv310c1ty 09-22-2006 04:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zim5354 (Post 1220357)
I like them, they help people.

Me too, I just don't like it when you have to read them for 10 minutes at an average reading speed.

Shaun 09-22-2006 05:11 PM

At 232 words in 10 minutes, you read a mere 23.2 words / minute? Elementary school testing had me tested at over 200 words per minute when I was ten.

Hey, I've even been clocked at 148 wpm in terms of typing.

23.2 WPM is not an average reading speed. Anybody who has difficulty reading any faster than that would be a very likely candidate for handicapp status and would be elegible for government support.

maximus_asinus 09-22-2006 07:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shaun (Post 1220689)
Hey, I've even been clocked at 148 wpm in terms of typing.

ORLY

zim5354 09-22-2006 11:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shaun (Post 1220689)
At 232 words in 10 minutes, you read a mere 23.2 words / minute? Elementary school testing had me tested at over 200 words per minute when I was ten.

Hey, I've even been clocked at 148 wpm in terms of typing.

23.2 WPM is not an average reading speed. Anybody who has difficulty reading any faster than that would be a very likely candidate for handicapp status and would be elegible for government support.

LOL PWNED!

Crono 09-23-2006 03:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by D4rKv310c1ty (Post 1220650)
Me too, I just don't like it when you have to read them for 10 minutes at an average reading speed.

No one asked you to read it.

killerogue 09-23-2006 03:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shaun (Post 1220689)
At 232 words in 10 minutes, you read a mere 23.2 words / minute? Elementary school testing had me tested at over 200 words per minute when I was ten.

Hey, I've even been clocked at 148 wpm in terms of typing.

23.2 WPM is not an average reading speed. Anybody who has difficulty reading any faster than that would be a very likely candidate for handicapp status and would be elegible for government support.

Oh? I got clocked at 119. :[ Damn Shaun.

maximus_asinus 09-23-2006 05:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by killerogue (Post 1220945)
Oh? I got clocked at 119. :[ Damn Shaun.

See 119 WPM is believable, I thought I was a fast typer, probably the fastest typer in the college I go to, and I only scored a 110 WPM on the typing exam.

WanDaMan 09-23-2006 08:26 AM

I can "touch type". Go me.

Shaun 09-23-2006 09:23 AM

148 was no errors either.

Keep in mind, that's when I was doing 3 hours + of C++ every day :P

Right now I would probably max out at about 120 wpm. I type leisurely at 60 - 80.

MysticX2X 09-24-2006 11:10 PM

I go nice at around 80 wpm, but i can exceed to over 100wpm. Depends what im typing.

KuJi 09-25-2006 01:32 PM

I can do about 200 with words like to and hi aswell =p

Crono 09-25-2006 04:15 PM

i read at 234098209 wpm

about that level...

smirt362 09-25-2006 05:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gerami (Post 1222072)
i read at 234098209 wpm

about that level...

Put enough caffeine in me and I could get up that high ;)

D4rKv310c1ty 10-10-2006 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gerami (Post 1222072)
i read at 234098209 wpm

about that level...

yeahh i'm pretty pro, I can read 1,000,000 WPM. Got Epic armor and all that shiz..

x.x


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 10:19 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright (C) 1998-2019 Toonslab All Rights Reserved.