![]() |
PWA guidelines on Classic Servers
Shouldn't there be some guidelines for classic servers? For example in 2002 I remember PWA told the freshly revived oldskool bravo that their levels were too plain to stay public.
Does PWA have such authority today? For example: Delteria + Atlantis' extreme lack of playerbase. Does PWA have the power to do anything? I also hear PWA have no power on the server Classic? Uh... I personally believe some kind of guidelines should be placed forward by the PWA team so that some classic playerworlds don't stay the same and crappy. A fine example would be Delteria, they are working on New Delteria but is anything being done on the server itself? Same situation as Valikorlia where Clash was told to update Valikorlia itself. Another example would be if an issue arises on Classic (the server) that requires global attention. Discuss. |
That's because back then graal had a player base of 2000+ and now has a playerbase of 400+ :o
|
I agree. There should be some PWA guidlines. And PWA's should check up on prospering PWs (SoG, SH, Esteria, Cynical) every now and then to see where they are at. :P And talk with the Managers.
|
I'm surprised this place didn't get more posts...it kind of is an important issue.
|
I will post for you Crono :P
Delteria is trying to create a new overworld, so they should definitly be put back into the developing process and taken off the classic list. Atlantis will not be taken off the list because it's the only German server. If Galbadia or whatever came back, then hopefully Atlantis would be removed. If some of you were smart you would convert your server to German to get an easy pass to classic :P |
Quote:
Quote:
Most servers that arent doing so good, usually go into a big Development stage of hopes to have a decent daily playercount after their development is complete. Delteria has a decent playercount everynight and weekend. Im not sure if im making much sense, but if Delteria has the current requirements to be on the Classic list, and are just improving themselves, what's the point to take them off? GraalOnline wants to attract players, not have them leave because a server was removed for no good reason, you know? It's like why are people complaining so much (Not directed to a sole player) that servers stay online? If servers that dont reach atleast a minimum of 40 players a day were to be removed from the classic tab, you could say goodbye to a few servers and alot of players. Also, you cant forget about the players in different timezones than yourself, youd be suprised at how many players come on when your in bed sleeping. I guess i can understand if a server was on the classic tab, no staff came online for days at a time and the daily playercount is low (5-10 daily), yes it should be removed. My point is that all the current 'inactive' servers on the classic tab are making a clear attempt at improving for the future, meaning staff come on all the time and develop, they still manage to have ETs host events for the players that do come online (Consideration/care). penalizing inactive playerworlds by putting them on the private list (especially when an attempt to improve is being made) is pointless in my opinion. If it does come to a decision, i think it should be up to the Owner of the server if he/she wants their Playerworld temporarily private due to inactivity. |
Quote:
I can also see how much Delteria has changed over the years. Let's not forget our old pal Atlantis, sitting there with no players at all. |
I think too much attention is going towards classic playerworlds and requirements are a bit too much. I think more attention and time should be put towards graal online official projects and gold servers specifically. Gold Servers really lack players and servers (there are still only 2 after all this time).
|
Quote:
I guess they learned english? |
Quote:
Anyhow having a multi language system that include English, Spanish, French, Italian, German, Chinese... would be in the best interest of any server. |
Atlantis had +130
There will be a new Overworld on Atlantis soon which will be like the OW in Zelda the WW |
Quote:
|
Quote:
:\ |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I believe no PWA that started playing in 2004/5 should have the right to decide what should or should not be on that server. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
That and PWA told me that PWA do indeed have power on Classic. |
You sure hate Delteria a lot
|
Quote:
Go on RC to chat with friends? |
Quote:
Quote:
Now, I can see that trying to have Classic removed for low player count is extremely unlikely. However, as far as bans, illegal content, music being hosted, staff behavior/management, etc goes it's all still under our umbrella. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Also, see attachment. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
The way I see it, if a server is payed for by a graalian or graalians, its a playerworld. If its sponsored by Graalonline its not. I've found that PWA try not to interfere with Classic administration unless they think rules of Graalonline are being broken. If it turns out to just be a local matter they'll either suggest something be done or leave it alone completely.
|
No, bell.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
That is, in short, anything we do on any other world, with the exception of removing it from classic. And if that really needed doing, for some unforseeable reason, it would be done also, only with Unixmad and Stefan's approval. |
Quote:
|
Stefan said Zodiac would go classic between today and Friday.
Unfortunately,Vulcan and Ibonic seems to be doing everything in their power to prevent me from developing. They just lost every bit of respect I had for them. |
Umm when was Classic ever considered a playerworld? It was an official project and was the beginning of graal (for the most part). Just because it's on the classic list doesn't mean it's essentially a playerworld. Classic is Classic, a playerworld are the other servers, just because it's managed like every other server doesn't matter.
|
| All times are GMT +2. The time now is 11:17 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright (C) 1998-2019 Toonslab All Rights Reserved.