Functions & Parameters
 

Functions should be able to handle extra parameters that are undeclared, much like trigger events:

To...

While I'm at it -- You may as well add a addWeapons() function O,o; It might serve it's purpose... Or let everyone who wants to do that do like me?

Reenable this.destroy() == Deleting the weapon
(client & serverside) and let protectedweapon prevent it from deleting serverside?

Umm... Removing weapons with GUI Control doesn't delete the GUI Control.

Since when did we declare parameters for functions?

Since GS2?

function addWeapons(parameter,parameter)?

Huh. I don't remember naming the params, but I suppose I haven't used GS2 in over a year now.

Why don't you just accept an array as one of the parameters?

Yes you can pass parameters as array, like myfunction(p1,p2,{p3,p4,p5}), then
function myfunction(p1,p2,openparams) {
echo(p1 @ "," @ p2 @ "," @ openparams[0] @ "," @ openparams[1]); // etc.
}

Thanks -- Although, it's a weird way to do such thing.

This should go in Tech:
fuction x(){ return {list};}

sendtonc(x());
== CRASH!

This should go here, however ('creates new thread')
return should be able to return string lists?

This too:

Instead of saving the strings with """Text""" in a string list, you could do:

{"Test","Other"}

Where everything in the " to the last " aren't shown, and the "'s in text can be worked out with the escape character, such as: \"
Thus:
{"John: And then, bobby said \"Maipas!\","Billy: No?! REALLY!?"}
INSTEAD OF:
"John: And then, bobby said ""Maipas!""","Billy: No Really?!"

If would make the strings a lot more readable, especially in multidimensional arrays:
"Ditto,""prop,prop"",Ditto,""prop,prop""","Ditto," "prop,prop"""",prop""""""","Ditto,""prop,"""
Instead of:
{{"Ditto",{"prop","prop"},"Ditto",{"prop","prop"}} ,{"Ditto",{"prop","prop"}}}

The second form is a lot easier to read then the first one, and we can establish a more direct meaning between the tring being a string, string list, or variable.

It's crashing the npcserver?

... Yea?

Uhhh, you can already use escape sequences for strings.

I was referring to the string lists... In /open Velox Cruentus list.... O,o;

I agree with Velox, having string arrays saved as:
string=1,2,"3,32,33",4
istead of something like:
string={1,2,{3,32,33},4}
is annoying.