Gfx Noob!
 

This is what darkrazor insists on telling me
From DarkRazor:
sern is a retard

lowl, he cant talk bout gfx eitherway

hes a ****ing noob in gfx

f* him lol
ZeroTrack (12/1/04 12:12:53 PM):
graal FTP limit was lifted , this guy is a *****
From DarkRazor:

cant big imgs, graal limit

ZeroTrack (12/1/04 12:07:27 PM):
hes being lazy , it takes up less cpu time and its a lot cleaner

From DarkRazor:
no

cause u have to work with screen s*

lose imgs is messier but simpler

someone should tell this guy about making gfx, hes tring to argue that making a gui 1 gfx is stupid, mean while its easier to script as 1 img and its a lot cleaner. ALSO i own a gfx design business i dont think i m a noob when it comes to gfx ALSO i've been scripting for graal for 5 years and never once have i recieved a gui that was broken up into more than one img

Stop :spam:ing..

DR roxors

Sern, you're a dolt.

Seconded.

rofl. Splitting a gui in multiple parts (aka decoupling?) is a Good Thing.

Making a thread about it isn't going to solve anything...

Wtf? Stop laming the GFX forums, dude...

deff not , its much easier to to script as 1, and the code is a lot cleaner

this.w = {50,110,170};
this.h = {80,140,,200};
for(img=0;img<3;img++){
showimg 201,img1.png,x,y;
changeimgvis 201,4;
changeimgpart 201,0,0,this.w[img],this.y[img];
}

is a lot cleaner than

showimg 201,img1.png,x,y;
changeimgvis 201,4;
showimg 201,img2.png,x,y;
changeimgvis 201,4;
showimg 201,img3.png,x,y;
changeimgvis 201,4;


Hence the state.png!

Sern, you have reached a new low.

I like GUI's in 1 image more than multiple parts.

You just broke a forum rule, congratulations.

So one piece of imaginary code is cleaner than another piece of code you supplied. What does that prove?

wait you agree with me and say i reached a new low?


That hes wrong =/

o well, then i wish u good luck making a big ass graphic of 20 times 200x200pixels gfx only for the sake of scripting :redface:
it would probably get around... 3000x3000 :)




o , and sern, ur an *****, kthxbai

I'm sad for the employees of your company..

Sern if your a "Pro" Can i see some of your work?

its not that HUGE of a company buddy, right now its just me my brother about 7 of our friends that all goto pratt for gfx design and our accountant

Its me and my brothers company Hes the Gfx designer and I am the computer systems admin but im slowly learning more gfx things as we go along like i usally make the web templates for web site clients

Im not THE gfx designer of the company but i know a decient amount i can make somethings like this is some wallpaper, sized down of course for the forums

nice brushes.

Brush work isn't really related to graal... o.O

These don't have to be Graal graphics, and I've seen people do some pretty nice stuff with brushes, aswell as filters - the thing is anyone can use filters, there's no skill in it, atall... besides knowing where the filter is heh

i bet he didn't make the brushes.

gk has some brush gfx ^-^

Yeah, but gk sucks, so that pretty much sums it up ;)

true,
its easier and better to script websites when img is broken into peices , but graal scripting its easier to script a gui when its 1 img

and creativity

more work
heres a webtemplate i made , not broken up

Well that's Sern for ya ^_^

You showed us this, along, long time ago. :\

and it sux anyway, but dude, a 3000x3000px gfx wouldnt help u more then sepperating them dude, period, dont call me a noob for not making this retarded compose , period, k?

Seems more like scripting discussion than gfx discussion. But whatever, this has ran its course.

It is more efficient though, to make one image with all of the sprites used to go over the main part of the GUI included in the same image. I dont know about a 3000x3000 gui though, lol.