classes vs armor
 

I've noticed that the armor on G2K2 is pretty much designed for the first 3 classes.
Warrior
Barbarian
Thief
So shouldn't there be armor for the last 3 to?
Priest
Alchemist
Sorcerer
Such as Robes, hats, etc.
i'd say make it so you can make basic ones, but special cape's, robe's, hat's, etc. must be purchased at a shop.

I just don't see that it's fair that the last 3 classes don't get any armor.

Re: classes vs armor
 

Actually, theives almost always wear absolutely no armor.
they would go under the cloaks section.

edit
if they DID wear armor, it would be either leather armor, enchanted armor, or scalemail =p

The point i'm trying to make is that only the strongest classes get the armor... granted mage armor wouldn't be that great AC wise, but it would help them out.

Sorcerers, Alchemists etc. are getting robes and such later on in the game.

later does them no good now, lol
I mean the armlets, gloves, and belts haven't even been released yet.
Who's working on these things anyway? They've had more then enough time to make all of those items, or atleast 1 of them, and more then enough empty houses to put them in.

Thieves have yet to seeing anything exclusive to them.

You don't NEED armor because A) You fight with ranged spells and B) Those range spells are exceptionally powerful, while on the other hand, warriors REALLY need armor because it's necessary for them to fight.

What great mage or sorcerer in the history books didn't wear armor? Thank you, my point has been proved :P

NOT TRUE! we got stealing. oh wait. thats somthing everyone can get.
OH WAIT! we got sacks...no sorry again eeeevrybodddy has a sack or...seven =/