Graal (Stephane, Stefan) should remove the lesser servers.
 

Here's the way I see it, they're losing tons of money off these things, they lose money having to pay for the servers which get no business. Also, if you think about it, someone starts graal for the first time (on trial), he then randomly selects a poor quality playerworld and his disapointed by it, where as if he chose a more high quality playerworld, he may have bought an account.
It's just a thought, anyway.

Re: Graal (Stephane, Stefan) should remove the lesser servers.
 

When I first played on Classic, I think it automatically sent you there back then, I got PKed left and right. So, I tried Bravo Online and loved it, told all my friends about Graal, because it was cool back then.

- Kasuagi

master_ball:

When you get stronger you should give pay back to them but when your a noob you should practice sparring alot for they will be afraid of a noob lol.

I did that before and on my non-upgraded account im liek unstoppable and people still attack me.

Boy it is fun finding rich people.

Also I have to go to bed bye all!

Good night.

i started classic.. dint know what to do.. i used to pm no one answered me.. i kept floating around to others servers and

than SL came...
SL was tight with that intro well.. atleast thats what i felt back than.. it was huge but than it decreased in a smaller community but that doesnt mean its no fun.. I got p2p just for SL

Stephane? psh call him unixmad:rolleyes:

and no, no one will ever get ridda the lesser servers.

If thier not being played on. Thier not using as much bandwidth. If thier not using as much bandwidth. They cost less to keep up.

Unless im totally wrong. But that sounds like how it should work.

why keep up **** servers
its as simple as that

I pretty much dislike all the playerworlds currently up

they are old nothing new about them and crappie

they need to offer something more with good ideas, frolic gave it a good shot

Everytime they put up a new playerworld they should just get rid of one or two of the old ones. Going on playercount or something..

Yep. Some new person wants to change graal every month with this idea, failing to realize what Bandwidth is.

That's a ****ing stupid idea.

Say there was 5 playerworlds to start with.
Put one up (6), take two down (4).
Put another up (5), take another two down (3).
Put one more up (4), take two more down (2).
Put one up again (3), and take two more down (1).
Put another one up again (2), and then, take the last ****ing two down (0).

Yeah, great. :rolleyes:

Haha, ZORG = Owned.

-Brett

here is a system:

A server doesnt get a player count ver 20 for a week. A pole goes up and everyone votes if it shuold go down or stay up. At least 75% of the votes have to be Take it Down

archaon
Not everyone has a P2P account to vote here with, wich will mean that not everyone who plays that server will be allowed to vote if it is a classic server.

doesnt have to be on the forums goofy face.

remember a long time ago when classic had those polls?

They could take down some servers. Some of the servers are basically the same. They need servers that aren't like any other. I don't mean level wise, but creative wise. Unique is what Graal needs. Sure it's hards to think of new innovative things that havn't been done before, but some servers should atleast try harder. :o

Well, at least thy hould consider doing something about the bottom 5 servers. They have maybe 5 people maximum per day, I don't think it helps much keeping them up.

Fine then take down 1 for everyone they put up.
then they would always have the same number of playerworlds the only reason I said take down 2 or 1 is because if they started taking down a couple for each one at first the total number would decrease then they could just take down 1 for every 1 put up.

LOL
 

yes take all the crappy servers down so there is room for MY GOOD SERVER! LOL

But 4 Real
 

But For Real, i think the servers who aren't getting a suffient ammount of players per day should get kicked off the island.... errr... i mean server list

The reason they are keeping the servers up is simple. They want it to appear as if they've done all this tremendous work and put effort into making it look as if Graal's not in a recession, when in all actuality, it certainly is. If Stefan/Stephane shut down all the "crappy" playerworlds, then a few people here and there would get pissed and just quit, taking away from Graal's chance of convincing them to upgrade their accounts. That's how it works, I think.

- Kasuagi