Proof that Hawk's review of Maloria was non-legitimate
 

Hawk = Opposite.
This log proves that he was bribed with a staff position and only accepted it for fun. The playerworld must be taken down now.

---
Opposite (02/06/2002 7:13:08 PM):

your mother is made of cheese :(

---
You (02/06/2002 7:16:10 PM):

:(
haha did they bribe you to accept this or something?

---
Opposite (02/06/2002 7:16:49 PM):

yes :(:(:(:(
actually WHY do you know like it.
like 50 players like it and then the other 50 don't liek it.
WHAT IS THE REASON what is wrong with it besides the
clientside shitty job they ddi

---
You (02/06/2002 7:17:33 PM):

well, it's ugly and boring and really really old delteria bad

cmon they bribed you, right? this pw is awful

---
Opposite (02/06/2002 7:18:05 PM):

heh I am quitting anyway I guess I did it for fun gahaha dear god

---

Re: Proof that Hawk's review of Maloria was non-legitimate
 

Refer to sig, Aftershock

Refer to your rating, Logo.

what about it? i have a two, so what?

James: The playerworld isn't that bad, it's better than most playerworlds I've seen up anyway.

Re: Re: Proof that Hawk's review of Maloria was non-legitimate
 

Bah and he wonders why Unixmad banned him from ever becoming staff again on graal. For main servers and graal itself. I am sad by this.

We'll see what will become of this in the days to come.... Sad. Good thing the review team has been shortened some. Psyker posted all who can review.

If I catch a reviewer working on that server, problems will follow =/

Thanks TrueHeaT for the information. He basically said the same to me as well =/

**Hawk did indeed delete all the Maloria levels. He is now global banned off graal. The Hawk account is no more.**

Re: Re: Re: Proof that Hawk's review of Maloria was non-legitimate
 

you liek to ban accoutns, dont you? being as though u banned mine but forgot that you cant ban me from rc.... jeez. you should talk to peopel before you ban.

Re: Re: Re: Proof that Hawk's review of Maloria was non-legitimate
 

yay no more maloria

Re: Re: Re: Re: Proof that Hawk's review of Maloria was non-legitimate
 

Considering unixmad wants him banned from graal. I think your statement is invalid. Anyhow I will not argue with you because there is no point in it. It'll go no where, so whenever you are ready to have a conversation, I am not hard to find, anyhow that is why I did that so you could easily discuss things with me, as a protection.

See just like Hawk, he gets "Fired" and goes off and deletes the whole server. I didn't want that to happen because I am not sure how people take things these days they just go off and delete things =/

Re: Re: Re: Proof that Hawk's review of Maloria was non-legitimate
 

I need to speak to you on AIM, but I think you have privacy pref's on or something. :\

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Proof that Hawk's review of Maloria was non-legitimate
 

wow must be a first time unixmad wanted someone banned :megaeek:

THe ONE Maloria thread.
 

Sorry, there are too many taking up space on this forum. I'm going to start merging the threads soon. Please continue them here

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Proof that Hawk's review of Maloria was non-legitimate
 

Will Maloria be removed because of the illegitimacy of the review?

Re: Re: Re: Re: Proof that Hawk's review of Maloria was non-legitimate
 

Or he is NEVER ON I need to talk with him also. :/

Re: THe ONE Maloria thread.
 

ok i loev u

The entire first page is maloria threads

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Proof that Hawk's review of Maloria was non-legitimate
 

Yakuna was talking about you trying to ban Yakuna's accounts or something.

Just for reference, Yakuna did get ownership from Dark Warlock. It was massed and everything.

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Proof that Hawk's review of Maloria was non-legitimate
 

:| Yeah.

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Proof that Hawk's review of Maloria was non-legitimate
 

Maybe stefan reviewed it too?

They got an NPC-Server.

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Proof that Hawk's review of Maloria was non-legitimate
 

But Stefan has really bad taste! :\

The server is awful..

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Proof that Hawk's review of Maloria was non-legitimate
 

im not a *****, and i thought you knew me a little better than that. you are hardto find being as though ur not on aim, or 2k2.

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Proof that Hawk's review of Maloria was non-legitimate
 

I am on now. I will be on Prov RC.

So if you need me go there and find me and you can get all the info you need there

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Proof that Hawk's review of Maloria was non-legitimate
 

As for that

Dark Warlock stated he never gave him ownership and all this and that. Then people say he did, people say he didn't....It's a big mess, we will sort it out if Yakuna wants to put aside everything and sort it all out with myself and another.

Dark Warlock quit twice.

All I know is that, after getting noobishly attacked by every other person on Maloria, I am PRAYING that my playerworld will be gold. Just to cut down on the complete idiots.

Either that, or Oasis is going to have a banlist the size of Texas.

wts?why can't you say alaska instead of texas...it's bigger.texas hater :rolleyes:

What's with everyone making refrences to the lone star state? :(

They will get smarter.. Then upgrade.. NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Hawk failed Everworld and then went on to pass Maloria right after. I think Everworld was a lot better than Maloria.
That is just my opinion though.

I really don't like slavedriving playerworlds like Maloria. Tapping D for hours to make very little cash and things cost like 1,000 Gralats.

Ugh tapping D. Now I can't stop tapping myself even after I left.
I'm gonna poke my eyes out now!!

Thats enough for me. Need to go tap tap tap!!!

~Prince Dark

Ah well there was a few NP people on there and you know us NP players can't help but to pk. What made it even worse was the lack of interest in how we are supposed to make money by tapping D hundreds of times.

~Prince Dark

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Proof that Hawk's review of Maloria was non-legitimate
 

*Hawk (6/2/02 7:38:56 PM):
Stefan was like "YOU CAN LEARN" and just gave him the stuff to
do it
*Hawk (6/2/02 7:38:39 PM):
gahaha dear god I just acccepted this for fun I bet I don't
remember
Vermain (6/2/02 7:38:29 PM):
Crap, man, he shold LEARN then before constructing a buggy, unplayable playerworld.

Talking to Hawk before he was fired about why CyberX cannot code NPC-Server.

LOL I bursted out laughing at that.