graal 2002 gfx/texturemapping = bogus
 

okay is it just me or did they lie! they said there was new gfx?!!?!? all it is is drawings colored... and there pngs and not tiles so you cant edit them!?!?!? WTF... graal2002 playworlds will look the same as every other playworld since theres no way to make it look original.. and that stupid texture mappign for the ground is stupid.. you cant tell if your going uphill or not all you do i walk on a slant!!!

The picso.png tiles are mapped on the ground
The best place to see the hills and stuff is near the
ocean. The terrain can directly be edited with the level
editor

You can make them look different by using different
ground tiles, which will make the thing look different,
also the levels can be made more bumpy/plain

Re: graal 2002 gfx/texturemapping = bogus
 

Not exactly *wink*


Oh what fun it is to be surfing in the 22nd century!!!

ohhhhhh.... see i didnt really notice that :( but houses and barrels all look the same... btw will there be 2002 playerworlds?

2002 playerworlds? does graal have enough bandwith?

stefan did you just delete my thread about 139 servers?!?!?

so stefan did you talk to unixmad yet =\

yes it is! it has everythign to do with graal

It was probably deleted for a good reason, someone might read that then spend time looking for it and find it and try and produce another illegal server

that doesn't mean we're allowed to talk about it.

if you do i'd have to kill you...
 

its like the spy buisness, if you talk about it they have to kill you, just a warning...this is my first post in over a month, man what a sad place to post...

it has been less then a month.

lemme get this strait... these forums are for talking about graal..yet what i said is talking about graal... does that sound stupid to anyone else??? im not incouraging 139 servers or anything

The gserver for 139 shouldn't be discussed... if you continue posting about it you will probably get this thread deleted as well

Stefan doesnt want to hear the truth about how Graal has gone to **** and some people rather play the gservers now.

graal hasnt gone to ****

Well, people have different opinions. Thats mine.

your a *****...thats mine

thats a nice opinion.

yah yes I know it be >=)

how?

Re: graal 2002 gfx/texturemapping = bogus
 

Please be my friend :p

Cowboy Bebop is the shitz. :rolleyes:

good question

The 139 thread is probably gone because it is like advertising for another game which is NOT aloud on these forums, so you are lucky thatyou can still post.

I got the idea that Graal 2002 was totally differant than 2001. It's just Graal 2001 in 3-D form. :rolleyes:

g2k1 is better than g2k2...

who agrees?

hehe its like the spi business where they kill you whether you tell or not because they can't take the risk that you will

I don't.
g2k1 has a dead economy. g2k2 doesn't.
g2k1 is just about collecting hats/gralat. g2k2 isn't.

g2k2 wins.

Cant really say that yet since Graal2002 hasn't started =X

Lets just hope it won't be like that >=)
Pretty much whatever I aquire on 2k2 I'd keep it

i see your point toad, buttttt...

not everyone likes roleplaying or has a fast processor/gfx card. take me for instance. i don't has a fast pc or connection and the new graphic style isn't too pretty

so i'm stranded on g2k1, i hope that graal 2001 will only get better. i dough that now though, koni has left staff and he was the only one really doing anything *shrugs*

This is what I have:
Fast Graphics card? Yes. ATI Rage 128.
Fast Processor? No. P3 500mhz.
Fast Internet Connection? No. D I A L U P.

You think I don't lag on servers? I still like g2k2 better than g2k1.