Graal Forums

Graal Forums (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/index.php)
-   Feature request (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=194)
-   -   iPhone Remote Control Application (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=134257590)

Soala 01-08-2010 06:40 PM

iPhone Remote Control Application
 
If you vote no you're a looser. :whatever:


(EVERYONE CAN SEE WHO VOTED YES OR NO MUHAHAHAHAHA)

Immolate 01-08-2010 06:41 PM

No. iPhones suck.

Soala 01-08-2010 06:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Immolate (Post 1549073)
No. iPhones suck.

Well don't vote then, but seriously us iPhone users need one.

Immolate 01-08-2010 06:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alexandralove (Post 1549074)
Well don't vote then, but seriously us iPhone users need one.

I'm just being difficult :( I think focus on Graal v6 is more important though.

Soala 01-08-2010 06:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Immolate (Post 1549075)
I'm just being difficult :( I think focus on Graal v6 is more important though.

Yeah I agree on that too, but developing the application wouldn't take long I believe. They can spend to months to make it if they want, as long as we get one ! What I'm trying to say is that WE NEED ONE.

fowlplay4 01-08-2010 07:14 PM

Already is one through the iPhone Client (just chat though), you just need access to it and server warping.

Rufus 01-08-2010 08:16 PM

What would be the point?

xXziroXx 01-08-2010 08:25 PM

No - completely useless and would only be used as a chatroom, which is rather fail.

Soala 01-08-2010 08:31 PM

I believe it would help some people to be online and chat about projects, etc...

Grey 01-08-2010 08:48 PM

I vote no. Not much point and a pain to use on a small screen.

Quote:

Originally Posted by alexandralove (Post 1549103)
I believe it would help some people to be online and chat about projects, etc...

There are lots of ways to communicate and a lot of instant messenger apps available which would accomplish the same thing.

cyan3 01-08-2010 09:06 PM

I'd have to say yes, not directly for the reason of the iPhone. As Chris said in another thread it would help the development for a Mac Remote Control which would be a big plus for many users.

Mark Sir Link 01-08-2010 09:55 PM

looks like I'm too late to ask what practical purpose it would serve

Tigairius 01-08-2010 10:01 PM

I vote yes, since a lot of the things I have to do as a global require simply RC chat (to use /global commands), it could be useful to me.

GGMallow 01-08-2010 10:55 PM

I would really like this as sometimes I need my RC away from my desktop. Just the other day I needed to add some folder rights to one of my staff, but they had to wait until I got home. Of course, I feel this way if I am allowed to connect to my playerworld but ether way I feel it is a nice idea.
PS. Id still like to v6 first though, which I hear is close anyway...

LoneAngelIbesu 01-08-2010 10:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cyan3 (Post 1549110)
I'd have to say yes, not directly for the reason of the iPhone. As Chris said in another thread it would help the development for a Mac Remote Control which would be a big plus for many users.

Or just focus on developing for Mac? ;)

cyan3 01-08-2010 11:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LoneAngelIbesu (Post 1549146)
Or just focus on developing for Mac? ;)

Mac and Linux users are disadvantaged in development for graal as they don't have many of the same development tools as Windows users. I guess Linux is a little less disadvantaged than Mac as they have an external remote control already but still lacks other development tools. This will probably get better soon with the increase of internal development tools using GS2 making the tools capable for all platforms which comes to another possibility. Using the client remote control as an example, it may be possible to incorporate the remote control into a separate application without having to login to the graal client to use the remote control, essentially turning the client remote control into an external one. This could be used on the iPhone as a remote control and may be easier to implement than a remote control that isn't using GS2 as a basis. Although this is just a thought and I don't know how possible it would be to implement.

MajinDragon 01-09-2010 01:09 AM

Voted yea but I'll just say that Stefan is fail @ business. I won't elaborate because nothing will come from it, it's been over a decade now right. If you look at Graal and it's development as a journey how far has it gone? Imo it has sat down for a few years, gotten scared and confused and backtracked, then went off course.

Fulg0reSama 01-09-2010 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MajinDragon (Post 1549177)
Voted yea but I'll just say that Stefan is fail @ business. I won't elaborate because nothing will come from it, it's been over a decade now right. If you look at Graal and it's development as a journey how far has it gone? Imo it has sat down for a few years, gotten scared and confused and backtracked, then went off course.

Just saying i believe its unixmad that you wanna pin your blame at if anyone.

stefan is an authority i suppose on this **** but unixmad controls the entire thing.

Crono 01-09-2010 07:46 PM

sounds ok, focus on pc client first plx

Stephen 01-09-2010 09:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MajinDragon (Post 1549177)
Voted yea but I'll just say that Stefan is fail @ business. I won't elaborate because nothing will come from it, it's been over a decade now right. If you look at Graal and it's development as a journey how far has it gone? Imo it has sat down for a few years, gotten scared and confused and backtracked, then went off course.

Sorry to boom topic off course, but I have to partially disagree - and it's not because I hold any good-will towards Stefan.

They have created an engine (and a process) which slip-streams iPhone development down to practically nothing. That's a pretty impressive feat. The nicest thing is the new game engine makes it possible to publish ubiquitously across mobile platforms... and that, my wee little e-friend, is kick ass. :cool:

Rufus 01-09-2010 09:46 PM

Aside from it having questionable uses, how would it be distributed? Wouldn't you have to jailbreak your iPhone? It's not exactly something that can be published through iTunes.

Demisis_P2P 01-10-2010 01:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rufus (Post 1549355)
It's not exactly something that can be published through iTunes.

I think that maybe the existing Classic Graal for iPhone app is using the guts of v6. So maybe it already is published through iTunes?

DustyPorViva 01-10-2010 01:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Demisis_P2P (Post 1549407)
I think that maybe the existing Classic Graal for iPhone app is using the guts of v6. So maybe it already is published through iTunes?

His point is though that iTune apps are available to everyone, much like in a store. Graal can go there because it's being marketted as a game. However, RC, a tool, will be odd because everyone can browse and see it in the store, but they'll have no clue what it's for.

Demisis_P2P 01-10-2010 01:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DustyPorViva (Post 1549410)
His point is though that iTune apps are available to everyone, much like in a store. Graal can go there because it's being marketted as a game. However, RC, a tool, will be odd because everyone can browse and see it in the store, but they'll have no clue what it's for.

I thought v6 was using scripted RC only? And if the current iPhone app uses v6 then it would also support the current iteration of the scripted RC?

So they could just add the option to "Log in as RC" to the current iPhone app?

I can't see it being done any other way. Stefan definitely won't re-script the RC, he has said for years that he's not updating the current stand-alone RC because it's going scripted only. And in order to use the scripted RC on the iPhone it would need to be packaged with the bones of the client anyway, so they might as well include it in the existing app?

Stephen 01-10-2010 02:14 AM

You can issue test versions of software to up to 100 users - would probably be perfect for RC on iPhone.

Clockwork 01-10-2010 07:26 AM

I hate typing on the iphone enough as it is. So other than that, I wouldn't have any use of it.

Fulg0reSama 01-10-2010 12:48 PM

Yeah... I can imagine myself doing what clockworks signature is doing but with a big frown and ya know.... Not looking like a girl.

jkldogg 04-23-2010 02:15 AM

Xd
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cyan3 (Post 1549110)
I'd have to say yes, not directly for the reason of the iPhone. As Chris said in another thread it would help the development for a Mac Remote Control which would be a big plus for many users.

MAC COMPUTERS DON'T HAVE REMOTE CONTROL?!? haha fail


One more reason why this is true:

PC > MAC

Mac Users ==> :cry: <== Mac Users

kia345 04-23-2010 02:25 AM

Maybe after developing is actually on the iPhone.

Stephen 04-23-2010 02:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jkldogg (Post 1571445)
PC > MAC

Cali V2 :rolleyes:

Skyld 04-23-2010 02:50 AM

1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by jkldogg (Post 1571445)
MAC COMPUTERS DON'T HAVE REMOTE CONTROL?!? haha fail


One more reason why this is true:

PC > MAC

Mac Users ==> :cry: <== Mac Users

Say what?

cbk1994 04-23-2010 03:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skyld (Post 1571450)
Say what?

He was also convinced that they didn't have an F11 button :noob:

He has decided that he hates Apple computers due to the fact that I use one.

TSAdmin 04-23-2010 05:49 AM

What a waste of a 3 month bump, JKLDogg... tsk..

Matt 04-23-2010 06:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alexandralove (Post 1549103)
I believe it would help some people to be online and chat about projects, etc...

Agreed 100%

adam 04-23-2010 03:45 PM

Great idea, I don't have an iPhone, but it'll help a lot of people stay active and connected.

Admins 04-23-2010 03:50 PM

There is an RC for Mac. The scripted RC could sometime made working fine on iPhone OS, on iPad and on iPhone/iPod touch with iPhone OS4 you can even use bluetooth keyboards.

dNeonb 04-23-2010 07:37 PM

I'd more likely prefere a working RC for Windows 7. I can't log on a server - when I try the application just freezes. Using the scripted RC is not really nice without external windows at all.
But I hopefully won't have this problem anymore because soon I get my Mac which I then could use.

xAndrewx 04-23-2010 08:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dNeonb (Post 1571627)
I'd more likely prefere a working RC for Windows 7. I can't log on a server - when I try the application just freezes. Using the scripted RC is not really nice without external windows at all.
But I hopefully won't have this problem anymore because soon I get my Mac which I then could use.

Works fine for me o-o

Matt 04-23-2010 09:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dNeonb (Post 1571627)
I'd more likely prefere a working RC for Windows 7. I can't log on a server - when I try the application just freezes. Using the scripted RC is not really nice without external windows at all.
But I hopefully won't have this problem anymore because soon I get my Mac which I then could use.

If that happens, try using the Non-Graphical menu. If that works, this usually means that RemoteControl2.exe isn't being ran from Graal directory, or so i think.

cbk1994 04-24-2010 01:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dNeonb (Post 1571627)
I'd more likely prefere a working RC for Windows 7. I can't log on a server - when I try the application just freezes. Using the scripted RC is not really nice without external windows at all.
But I hopefully won't have this problem anymore because soon I get my Mac which I then could use.

Works fine for me, although it always freezes until NC loads.


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 07:50 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright (C) 1998-2019 Toonslab All Rights Reserved.