![]() |
Quote:
And the only cool items, in my humble opinion, are instruments. I never understood the hat craze. Saw Nightmareangel busting out the Star Wars theme song with the sax. Very cool. |
2k2 could always be setup like valkoria, ban players for not having rp names, ban players for pking, etc.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
if 2k2 ever ended up like val, id smack stefan
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Graal 2002 will have a totally role-playing environment, so it will make it harder to PK people and it will be much easier to be in character (IC). |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
but dammit, He likes money! I can agree =) |
Quote:
|
the end
|
Re: .
Quote:
|
Quote:
They said they were gonna take them down like 5 days ago, but they're still up. If Valikorlia would be a person, it would be RobinX (kidding ;)) or Artificial_Sweetener (not kidding). |
Quote:
|
Re: Re: .
Quote:
|
Re: .
Quote:
|
And also Phantasm, a true oldbie doesnt care if they are an oldbie or not.
|
Re: Re: Re: .
Quote:
Yes I am going to ***** and gripe about your grammar because I can. |
*sighs and goes to make one of his long ranting threads*
|
Re: .
Quote:
|
Re: Re: .
Quote:
|
Re: Re: .
Quote:
The fact that you would mention that a certain server having more power over another is a laughable matter. It's still Graal. That's like saying G2K2 owns G2K1. What does THAT accomplish? :p |
*sigh* Both Graal Classic and Graal 2001 have their flaws and strengths and people from both places should not consider the other people on the other server inferior because they play that server as Classic and 2001 are just about even with their good points. Graal 2001 has excellent levels, yes, but they also have level makers who start project after project without finishing them, leaving a lot of unfinished places. Graal 2001 is even with Classic in terms of Staff Intellegence/"Corruptness", both have their good ones, bad ones, and power abusers. Graal Classic has their ass load of quests while 2001 only has a few and some dungeons, which were a very good addition, thanks to Stefan.
I've seen too many people from 2001 however, either thinking their former status there would promise them a job on Classic, or talking badly about Classic on points that are 6 months to a year old. Classic has evolved from what it was like 2001 is doing. Classic was a server with poor levels and poor people and has evovled with better levels; better quests; better people. Let's go back to what 2001 was a few months ago, a poorly run server, period. The only thing 2001 had was the economy, and even that was shot to hell by hats and such. The rich were extremely rich, the poor were extremely poor, and hats were everything. Stupidity reigned then with idiotic scammers that used fairly stupid means of getting money, constant acusations about staff members, and frequent *****ing at the marketplace. It has evolved from that, it now has hats lifted off it's main economy, fun new dungeons, and a better RP environment. Please, if you want to complain about something, get updated on what you are complaining about, Trueheat. My main point is that we need to get along, Classic players are no better than 2001 players, and vice versa. An 'oldbie' is no better than a 'newbie', it's all on how they act. |
Quote:
Oldbie, newbie, yeah, it's all dependent upon how you act. Like starting straight from G2K1 and then talking crap about Classic is just plain stupid. And I've been around longer than shockedfrog, I don't wave it around as superiority like he does. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Yeah, Phantasm, you don't need to wave the fact that you started 2-3 years ago like a f'kn banner, just makes you look stupid and pisses people off. |
Quote:
|
Ask Brad if Classic is laggy, ask Alkaren! They'll tell you that it isn't and that if you maybe logged on it for more then 3 seconds you'd clearly see it isn't laggy.
|
Quote:
I actually lag more on G2K1 than I do on Classic. In fact, I don't lag on Classic at all. And I DON'T GET HIT FROM 8 TILES AWAY BY A SWORD ON CLASSIC! :grrr: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I played classic several months before I upgraded. And yes, classic is not as laggy as people claim. Sometimes I lag badly, other times I don't *shrugs* same as on 2001. I like both servers, and like DC said, they both have their strengths and weaknesses. Neither is better then the other, nor does playing one make you any better then someone who plays the other. |
Re: Re: Re: .
Quote:
I don't mean more "power" in the literal sense of the word, I mean sort of...more umph, I s'pose you can say. |
all oldbies play on classic?
oldbies are all over the place, i have been playing graal for almost 4 years, and i know my way around most of the servers, just because i choose to play on another server that interested me doesn't mean that i'm stupid you need to get the **** out of your ass and mouth and just go away |
Quote:
|
i didnt start in 2.03
i started in the early 1.2's |
Re: .
Quote:
Wouldnt it be good if the 2k1 admins PLAY 2k1 though? |
Holy:
And I started playing graal way before 2k1 came out, so dont call me a newbie. I started 1.28 but played zelda online with my friend matt. I went over to his house and he showed me it and i joined a while later |
hell, i just came across it by accident, lol
i remember when it was the white website design, with the java counter that showed how many people were on the site then, lol |
While I certainly appreciate your spirit in defending your chosen servers, might I point out that we are still one Graal? It's like the rivalry between the Army, Navy, Marines and Air Force...they all hate each other, but they're all on the same team...but I digress.
In regards to the people who upgraded before the deadline getting more rights - see also campaign finance reform. I'd just as soon see staff and power based on talent and dedication rather than the depth of one's pocketbook. In regards to the statement that one lags more than the other - I've found that all new worlds, G2K2 included, lag like crazy - until you finish downloading the graphics. Naturally, the Classic denizens only download a couple new graphics per session, and so have practically no lag, whereas the G2K1 denizens take an awfully long time to download everything on Classic, and vice versa. There is also caching, which takes about ten seconds in which I can hardly move, even offline - then all the sounds are in memory and it smooths out. In regards to levels, as Classic's LAT I believe I am uniquely qualified to pass judgement. G2K1 has beautiful levels, and some wonderful NPCs. Naturally, they've had newer features longer, and their own graphics team (or rather, unique access to THE graphics team), so it is to be expected. Classic's levels, in all fairness, still look like they were all written out on seperate sheets of paper and stapled together...we're still missing that L shaped land mass at the Destiny Desert, Zorro's House probably STILL doesn't line up correctly, etc...however, Classic has the start of what may be a promising quest. G2K1 has a bunch of oldschool Classic quests - get bored, walk into a dungeon, die several times (restarting frequently so you don't get knocked all the way to the start), and come out with a more powerful weapon/shield/more hearts, but there's no common thread to it, no greater reason for your actions. If G2K1 got a dedicated LAT Chief - BirdBird's great, but he's too stretched out between 3 worlds - who started threading it together, you'd have the best of both worlds - great graphics, NPCServer smoothness, and a plot. Then I'd really have to worry, as Classic would be G2K1 Junior...I still have to make all my own graphics over here. ^_^ Classic - wins for plot G2K1 - wins for prettiness IMHO. |
| All times are GMT +2. The time now is 10:00 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright (C) 1998-2019 Toonslab All Rights Reserved.