How has it come to these days that stating your opinion is a troll attempt

What other reason would he have for stating his volatile political beliefs regarding Obama in this thread except for an attempt to cause arguments?

And then he goes on to bluntly state his opinion on Chris with no insight at all, and follows it up with some nonsense about grandma foot fetishes?

You need a new troll detector.

He was replying towards another players and the fact he chose that kind of metaphor to match the other players is a possible coincidence, Not a lot of people like the president ya know.

The grandma foot fetish thing other than trying in a very strange way convey his hate towards chris... you got me there. But he could just not like Chris.

Maybe my troll detector's batteries are low.

He dislikes me because he got banned while I was manager for repeatedly PMing staff members embedded pictures of vaginal warts.

Hot. PM pix plz.

bad poster =! troll

Fulg0re, let's write a guide for how to determine when someone's being stupid or trolling

Yeah, Let's do it.

umad bro?

This^

I can haz

How many frivolous responses is this now?

At least we weren't baited by the obvious attempt to elicit a political debate.

I'm sorry Demesis, Wikipedia is not a source that is viable here. You lost the game.
More importantly if you believe Wikipedia is a credible source for this you sir have no argument basis whatsoever.

Well that's just, like, your opinion, man.

You lost the game! YOU LOSE. MUAHAHAHAHA!!!

Not really, Ask any intelligent person and they'll tell you the same. It's more of a unspoken rule.

Not really. It's a fact that Wikipedia is contains more knowledge than the most intelligent person you know.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...t_2007.svg.png

But can you understand how much of that knowledge is usually editted upon? More importantly if you have to look up on Wikipedia about internet terms than you simply have no knowledge to it of your own now do you?

How isn't it, he showed up attempting to qualify his opinion as a fact with the way his sentence is structured.

Not really, Having a sense of grammar does not a fact make.
You're completely overanalyzing this.

And? Do you understand how much real world knowledge changes every day?
Any time you choose to believe something that you read or that somebody tells you, you're just accepting that particular interpretation as being the most believable at that point in time. It does not make that belief the absolute truth.

Until recently it was believed that the Triceratops and the Torosaurus were two separate species of Dinosaurs. It is now generally accepted that they are the same dinosaur in different stages of growth.
http://images.dailytech.com/nimage/16073_montanedu1.jpg
A lot of people aren't up to date on paleontology news and still incorrectly believe that the Triceratops is it's own species. Wikipedia has already been updated to reflect the new findings though. Smart eh?

I could have just given my own definition, but how much weight would that carry? Less than Wikipedia.

YOUR POST IS INVALID BECAUSE DINOSAURS DID NOT EXIST


coolface.jpg

Wikipedia says they did, but somebody edited it to say that they lived 5000 years ago, alongside early man.

Do you understand that even if facts and information is constantly changing things such as internet trends do not?

lol did they give a credible source?

Yes, we're clearly setting the record straight for Wikipedia itt.

Yeah someone understands the topic. I should have said.

Now that the record for chris has been set straight we will now discuss the intricate workings of Wikipedia.

There are thousands of knowledgeable individuals whose single purpose in life is to ensure that every update on Wikipedia is completely factual

Sort of like how SlikRick maintains the N-Pulse forums.

MajinDragon?

I half expected him to apply at Coca-cola Company as a webmaster just to edit Sprite's flavor and prove me wrong.

era kids these days

agreed.

chris is 15 im 56

im so much more mature comon

o.O? Do you know the definition of hypocrisy?

Civility in this thread really needs to pick up. If it continues at this level, consider it locked.

All of the threads concerning your cowardly act should have been closed a long time ago.

no longer a man this one is

I like how I get silenced.

Truth will never be told :p.

PM ME dood!

Uhm.. Point out examples of where we are acting "barbaric" and or "uncivil" because I believe we have kept a pretty cool level of civility.

Only time I've seen uncivil chat is the obama post but other than that I don't see your reason for saying what you've said :confused:

You two obviously didn't get to see the posts I deleted, before they were deleted. If you had, I'm sure we'd all agree that hate speech to the vulgar degree witnessed in the deleted post is unacceptable.