Graal Forums

Graal Forums (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/index.php)
-   Dustari (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=86)
-   -   Cut the craP :( (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=77371)

Crimson2005 11-07-2007 08:50 PM

I wish I was King.

Gothika 11-07-2007 09:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crimson2005 (Post 1356899)
I wish I was King.

I wish you were too, It'd kick ass then.

MajinDragon 11-08-2007 07:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gothika (Post 1356894)
So Dustari would need an army to take on Samurai .When Yann could probably take on Samurai by himself? Not to mention the others we have with high physique, Alan, Maroku, Sage and so on.

Bosh would need to amass an army alone as the Emperor of ZR (If things went according to plan). Dustari, as the new ZR's Allies, would assist in any fight involving enemies of ZR. This does not imply that an 'army' of Dustarian's is required, but it does mean that some key members might be asked or volunteer, without request from the King, to aid in the war effort.

CABAL49 11-09-2007 12:00 AM

Wehn Bosh was trying to take Zormite it was terrible. Zormite has the lowest level players, and since it is the third reconstrution I have been part of, we had very weak leadership since really Zormite never recoverd from Graynt. There is not much Drake could do since he had too much stuff irl. Bosh was right though, Dustari and Zormite's actvity spiked when he did his war mongering. In terms of military Zormite is pretty weak still, because we are still trying to establish a working order. No other Kingdom went through what Zormite did, in a few days a complete eradication of the kingdom just to rebuild it. Kingdoms needs more wars to keep it spicey. But Zormite is not ready for war. I can't think of any kingdom right now that can fight at this moment with atleast half of thier people.

Horrified 11-09-2007 12:54 AM

lol kingdoms drama

seriously anyone who is dumb enough to actually hate someone over being in a ceartin group has more problems then dealing with a GK war

make some allies and have some fun

MajinDragon 11-09-2007 01:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CABAL49 (Post 1357174)
Kingdoms needs more wars to keep it spicey. But Zormite is not ready for war.I can't think of any kingdom right now that can fight at this moment with atleast half of thier people.


Don't promote war if you can't participate in one
:noob:
Thats mainly because there is no system to control inactivity within the ranks. Just look at Forest/CP, all those members yet less than 5-8% are active.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Horrified (Post 1357180)
lol kingdoms drama

seriously anyone who is dumb enough to actually hate someone over being in a ceartin group has more problems then dealing with a GK war

make some allies and have some fun

There's no fun in everyone just being friends... Infact the thought of a society where everyone likes everyone makes me sick... Conflict is essential.

Crimson2005 11-09-2007 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Horrified (Post 1357180)
make some allies and have some fun

I don't get it. Why make allies when there's no enemies? Or did I miss the point?

Crono 11-09-2007 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crimson2005 (Post 1357239)
I don't get it. Why make allies when there's no enemies? Or did I miss the point?

so you can have big rp dinners and craP

:)

cyan3 11-09-2007 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gerami (Post 1357241)
so you can have big rp dinners and craP

:)

Not a bad idea i might just have an rp dinner :p

Gothika 11-09-2007 11:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cyan3 (Post 1357243)
Not a bad idea i might just have an rp dinner :p

Forgive him, he is a wannabe jehovah's witness.

cyan3 11-09-2007 11:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gothika (Post 1357244)
Forgive him, he is a wannabe jehovah's witness.

:whatever:

Gothika 11-09-2007 11:24 AM

Anyway, yeah. A world full of alliance is sucky. Only the weak need allies.

kia345 11-09-2007 01:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gothika (Post 1357246)
Anyway, yeah. A world full of alliance is sucky. Only the weak need allies.

Mr. T has friends

Gothika 11-09-2007 06:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kia345 (Post 1357250)
Mr. T has friends

Their not friends, they just pay him for protection.

MajinDragon 11-09-2007 11:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gerami (Post 1357241)
so you can have big rp dinners and craP

:)

Quote:

Originally Posted by cyan3 (Post 1357243)
Not a bad idea i might just have an rp dinner :p

Can Dustari come and play?:p:noob:>_<

Horrified 11-10-2007 12:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MajinDragon (Post 1357185)
There's no fun in everyone just being friends... Infact the thought of a society where everyone likes everyone makes me sick... Conflict is essential.

Conflict where you dislike someone for being in a ceartin group, prejudice?

Crimson2005 11-10-2007 12:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Horrified (Post 1357437)
Conflict where you dislike someone for being in a ceartin group, prejudice?

It's more like competition to be honest.

MajinDragon 11-10-2007 12:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Horrified (Post 1357437)
Conflict where you dislike someone for being in a ceartin group, prejudice?

Call it what you want, conflict passes the time.

Crono 11-10-2007 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MajinDragon (Post 1357430)
Can Dustari come and play?:p:noob:>_<

Why is everyone ignoring my "craP" spelling. I'm trying to mock the thread creator here. :cry:

And no you can't play. >:[

Ziro_of_the_Turks 11-10-2007 11:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Horrified (Post 1357437)
Conflict where you dislike someone for being in a ceartin group, prejudice?

It's a ROLEPLAYING game.

Prejudice, racism, and even genocide should be toys to bring to the playground.

MajinDragon 11-10-2007 01:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gerami (Post 1357518)
And no you can't play. >:[

Party pooper >_< Oh well we can still crash the party :D:p

CABAL49 11-10-2007 08:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ziro_of_the_Turks (Post 1357519)
It's a ROLEPLAYING game.

Prejudice, racism, and even genocide should be toys to bring to the playground.

Actualy I made a poll and most players think that Kingdoms is a PK server even though most people don't PK.

MajinDragon 11-10-2007 08:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CABAL49 (Post 1357593)
Actualy I made a poll and most players think that Kingdoms is a PK server even though most people don't PK.

Opinion doesn't = Fact... The fact is, barely anyone on GK actually PK's, even those who like to pk and try to pk are just left with a handful of people who run... Hardly a pk server...

Gothika 11-12-2007 12:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CABAL49 (Post 1357593)
Actualy I made a poll and most players think that Kingdoms is a PK server even though most people don't PK.

Yeah but in that thread Googi hit the nail right on the head. GK is an economy based server right about now.

CABAL49 11-12-2007 01:45 AM

Iam am just daying that Kingdoms at this moment in time is far from an RP server.

MajinDragon 11-12-2007 07:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CABAL49 (Post 1357964)
I am just saying that Kingdoms at this moment in time is far from an RP server.

Corrected. And it is also far from a pk-server...

Stephen 11-20-2007 04:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crow (Post 1355467)
Heh, Stephens cool and stuff, but I seriously doubt hes the right person ;P

I've actually run a kingdom before, back when I was more active.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ravenblade1979 (Post 1355470)
Well it was up to tig. frankly there was probably better people for the job but tig chose stephen.

Name someone who is competent enough to develop ideas, lead a team, and manage a kingdom all at the same time - remember, they're going to need at least as much experience as I have with development to compare.
Quote:

Originally Posted by MajinDragon (Post 1355489)
If Kingdoms were extremely important and the playercount high, maybie i'd suggest another choice for King, but right now, it kind of doesn't matter.

That's pretty much how I feel about it right now. I'm not looking to establish the most active kingdom, or be the longest leader. Graal isn't worth that sort of commitment.

What I want to do is develop some new stuff for Dustari for FUTURE leaders, so kingdoms isn't so BORING.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gerami (Post 1355912)
That's too boring.

What, you're not a fan of the group hug?
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ziro_of_the_Turks (Post 1355969)
Here's an easy one for today's mediocre RPers: Makes friends OOC to work together and form a great IC tension and then war.
Then when your pros, you can actually learn to hate eachother and make RPing into a competition as it should be.

I haven't seen "real" RP on GK in two years, and I don't expect to see it anytime soon. I'm not a fan of roleplaying, actually - I find it homosexual in it's nature. But it undeniably makes Graal Kingdoms more interesting, so long as it's organized.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Crimson2005 (Post 1356844)
No, no no no no no no no no no no no no. We don't need allies. Especially with Zormite. How embarassing is that?

Gaha. hi5
Quote:

Originally Posted by Crimson2005 (Post 1356899)
I wish I was King.

I'll consider you for king when you can do some very basics tasks - which you've failed to do the most basic of up to this point.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Horrified (Post 1357180)
lol kingdoms drama

seriously anyone who is dumb enough to actually hate someone over being in a ceartin group has more problems then dealing with a GK war

make some allies and have some fun

You're assuming petty vengeance or such would be the only motive for war... in my case it would simply be to raise a little Hell... lol :p
Quote:

Originally Posted by MajinDragon (Post 1357185)
[B]
Thats mainly because there is no system to control inactivity within the ranks. Just look at Forest/CP, all those members yet less than 5-8% are active.

...That's actually why I logged on and noticed this thread... I'll get to that at the end.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gerami (Post 1357241)
so you can have big rp dinners and craP

:)

And group hugs.
Quote:

Originally Posted by MajinDragon (Post 1357595)
Opinion doesn't = Fact... The fact is, barely anyone on GK actually PK's, even those who like to pk and try to pk are just left with a handful of people who run... Hardly a pk server...

That's because the GermanKr3w made PKing ***. It used to be vicious and competitive, now you practically need an invite before you can PK another player.



Anyways, I'm going to make a thread for all of the members who DON'T want to be removed. Otherwise I'm "format C:\" all current members. It's just fluff and filler - and I invite other kingdoms to do the same.

Ziro_of_the_Turks 11-20-2007 09:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stephen (Post 1359442)
I'm not a fan of roleplaying, actually - I find it homosexual in it's nature.

But aren't you the king of Dustari?

So the leader of a roleplaying group has a negative attitude toward the practices on which the group is based AND the basis of the group itself?

MajinDragon 11-20-2007 11:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stephen (Post 1359442)
What I want to do is develop some new stuff for Dustari for FUTURE leaders, so kingdoms isn't so BORING.

Anyways, I'm going to make a thread for all of the members who DON'T want to be removed. Otherwise I'm "format C:\" all current members. It's just fluff and filler - and I invite other kingdoms to do the same.

I'd support the delisting of all inactive members from ALL kingdoms, except for the fact that it looks kind of sad when all the kingdoms have a combined playercount of 20... x_x

Stephen 11-21-2007 03:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ziro_of_the_Turks (Post 1359462)
But aren't you the king of Dustari?

So the leader of a roleplaying group has a negative attitude toward the practices on which the group is based AND the basis of the group itself?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stephen
That's pretty much how I feel about it right now. I'm not looking to establish the most active kingdom, or be the longest leader. Graal isn't worth that sort of commitment.

What I want to do is develop some new stuff for Dustari for FUTURE leaders, so kingdoms isn't so BORING.

That should have answered your question, but I guess you ignored it. What I want to do is enlist some competent individuals and set them in positions to maintain Dustari rather than trivial other factors.

You wouldn't build a rollercoaster with the mantra, "Screw structural integrity! I want to have fun NOW!"? Well, the only kingdom I've seen hold any sort of noteworthy competence in the last while was CP, and that was because it had competent individuals controlling it.

I'll worry about setting it up withstand, then I'll worry about making it fun.
Quote:

Originally Posted by MajinDragon (Post 1359555)
I'd support the delisting of all inactive members from ALL kingdoms, except for the fact that it looks kind of sad when all the kingdoms have a combined playercount of 20... x_x

It's simply a representation of the state of Graal Kingdoms. I understand that Dustari will look "pathetic" in comparison to other kingdoms, but if they did the same thing it would be a similar playing field. Besides, it all comes down to war - and when it does, it's not how many 1-hit wonder newbs you've got... it's how many power houses. Power-house players can usually be counted on two hands for an entire server.


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 08:26 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright (C) 1998-2019 Toonslab All Rights Reserved.