Graal Forums

Graal Forums (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/index.php)
-   GK Bugs (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=38)
-   -   Kingdom rank system (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=64722)

Crono 04-03-2006 02:22 PM

Since when were Queens higher than Kings? Look at chess, the queen may be valueable but won't cost you the game.

Same in real life. I saw what a great job Cleopatra did :rolleyes:.

Zero Hour 04-03-2006 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gerami
Since when were Queens higher than Kings? Look at chess, the queen may be valueable but won't cost you the game.

Same in real life. I saw what a great job Cleopatra did :rolleyes:.

lolpopular femaleleaders4onehundredalex

But, obviously, we don't have elfs in real life - so I think it's safe to say that this is a mythical kingdom, with a mythical ruling system :)

Draenin 04-04-2006 07:45 PM

You're mistaken on the gender thing. There is a reason for it. If you put King or Queen on the same tier, it sorts them by alphabetical order, usually, so K comes before Q, therefore King is at the top. If you put priest / priestess on the list, there are more letters in the word priestess than priest, so priest goes before priestess. And the list can continue as long as you're willing to go.

Try this, if it really bugs you that much:

- Go under the King ranking and change the rank name (Not the title) to Queen or whatever you want.
- Create a subheading rank for your clergy, and put priestess under the parent name of that subheading either first or second, and priest under the subheading as well. It might sort them by alphabetical order, and if that happens, play around with the names until you get it to be what you want. If you put each rank under the parent name of the same subheading, they will appear to be on the same tier, rather than priest being on the upper tier, and priestess on the tier below.

Let me know if all that helps.

ReBorn_Spirit 04-04-2006 10:24 PM

Uhm well Draenin was atleast getting to the point.
In Real life isnt the topic of this thread, if you wanted that, you click the wrong title.

AlaricoMontario 04-04-2006 11:55 PM

Dayaa, it's ZH: Don't waste your time, there's not enough Tylenol in the world for that.

Googi 04-05-2006 12:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gerami
Since when were Queens higher than Kings?

Since they got the K right.

Draenin 04-05-2006 01:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AlaricoMontario
Dayaa, it's ZH: Don't waste your time, there's not enough Tylenol in the world for that.

Oh, hey. Speaking for someone else on the forums. Now, which rule was that?

Zero Hour 04-05-2006 04:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Draenin
Oh, hey. Speaking for someone else on the forums. Now, which rule was that?

I believe he meant to use the semicolon. Regardless, it was quite insulting. But I'm quite confident that such people will believe whatever they wish, regardless of the facts.

He seems to think that my previous comment regarding Gerami's suggesting that such a rank system doesn't actually exist and therefor should not exist online which went along the line of "Elfs don't exist either, Gerami, so it's quite obvious that this is a mythical rank system" was one meant to negate that such a ranking system should be taken into consideration.

I personally hold that it's a fine example of player bias, and only brings question to the ability of such group's ability to argue in general.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Googi
Since they got the K right.

Hehe :)

Draenin 04-05-2006 09:38 AM

Ah, so he did post in your name. Underhanded, I must say.


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 08:15 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright (C) 1998-2019 Toonslab All Rights Reserved.