Graal Forums

Graal Forums (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/index.php)
-   Graal Main Forum (English) (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   How do you, personally, pronounce 'Graal' (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=44428)

cynicalfree1 04-30-2003 02:41 PM

Was just about to say what Ibonic just stated.Why dont we have Stefan or Unixmad answer this.

Androk 04-30-2003 02:58 PM

They answerd it once before, Stefan said it's Grawl.

Jeff 04-30-2003 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Kaimetsu


He has never said that.

He said the A's are pronounced as the A in Carl, as I recall.

draygin 04-30-2003 05:15 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Kaimetsu


But non-Americans do not pronouce 'Carl' as 'Cawl'.

most americans don't pronounce 'Carl' as 'Cawl' either. Thats like something you would see in Mississippi. :p

Hey cawl lets go down lets go down to that thar barn and milk a bull ya wanna? hehehe

MadWolf 04-30-2003 06:01 PM

Kai, I pronounce Carl, as Carl... now "Cawl." I'm Canadian :[

Jeff 05-01-2003 01:20 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Kaimetsu


But non-Americans do not pronouce 'Carl' as 'Cawl'.


The 'r' is unrelated.

draygin 05-01-2003 03:51 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Kaimetsu


No it isn't. When Americans pronounce 'Carl', the 'a' is more like an 'o'. Completely different sound.

I dont know what american's you talk to but most of us dont talk like that aside from some southerners. Most of us pronounce it as Car-l

Jeff 05-01-2003 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Kaimetsu


No it isn't. When Americans pronounce 'Carl', the 'a' is more like an 'o'. Completely different sound.


You are obviously generalizing from classic American films. Gone with the Wind and To Kill a Mockingbird, most likely.


Great works of art they are, they don't represent the speaking habits of the entire United States of America.

funnylinkwantsbomys 05-01-2003 06:32 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Kaimetsu


No it isn't. When Americans pronounce 'Carl', the 'a' is more like an 'o'. Completely different sound.

im american and everyone else i know pernounces Car-el

draygin 05-01-2003 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Kaimetsu


Incorrect.

You're generalizing it from something. Because the vast majority of americans don't talk like that. The only place you might see it is from people raised in southern states or parents who where from the southern states originally. Which is way less than half the american population. I would estimate that at most 20% of the population (if that) say cawl. My sister in law is from the south (georgia) she doesnt even say cawl. But she does say funny things like when talking to my mom she says Ms Liz or my mama says this or I"m fixing to. Hehehe funny stuff. But she doesnt talk retarded with messed up words like cawl.

Jeff 05-02-2003 05:03 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Kaimetsu
Look:

Jeff: It is pronounced 'Grawl'
Me: No it is not.
Jeff: It is pronounced the same as 'Carl'
Me: But that only works if you pronounce 'Carl' as 'Cawl'.
Jeff: We don't pronounce 'Carl' as 'Cawl'.
Me: Then 'Graal' cannot sound like 'Grawl'

Also, 'car-el'? Wha? Why don't you just pronounce it 'carl', you weirdos?

Because we're Americans. And we speak differently than Britons, because we let our language go corrupt.

Tseng 05-02-2003 05:12 AM

Gr-ah-l. In one syllable.

Googi 05-02-2003 05:43 AM

I pronounce the raa part like rar only without the last r.

Jeff 05-02-2003 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Kaimetsu


Well, somebody should fix that.



I guess it could be done, though it wouldn't be easy.

First off, you'd have to fix everyone's spelling, because that'd be the easiest thing to do. "Realize" to "realise" et cetera. That could be started off with spell checkers (US English options removed in computer programs).

Second off, you'd have to teach everyone the received pronunciation or somesuch. Good, standard way of saying things. No more Southern twangs, everyone sounds like the BBC. This'd take massive reeducation, perhaps tax refunds for people who can prove that they have made themselves sound British. If the New Yorkers still want to sound funny, there are plenty of British accents from which to choose that still wind up with a superior pronunciation. The New Yorkers could sound like Scots if they please.

Third off, introduce some of the developments in British English that never really caught on in America, i.e. particularly good neologisms and other words created since the Revolution that never really did or have had a chance to catch on. Languages seem to evolve more properly, rather than corrupting quite so fast, in their original locations of inception.

draygin 05-02-2003 05:40 PM

Yes and while we're at it how about some one fixes Australian language to make it english again. (sarcasm) If every one stuck with the same language and didnt allow for charge or the language to evolve chances are we would all be speaking Latin.

Jeff 05-02-2003 07:13 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by draygin
Yes and while we're at it how about some one fixes Australian language to make it english again. (sarcasm) If every one stuck with the same language and didnt allow for charge or the language to evolve chances are we would all be speaking Latin.

Sarcasm or not, I actually do hold the belief that the world would be better off if everyone spoke Latin, and there were an orderly procedure for expansion. It's so...logical.

draygin 05-02-2003 08:20 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jeff



Sarcasm or not, I actually do hold the belief that the world would be better off if everyone spoke Latin, and there were an orderly procedure for expansion. It's so...logical.

The sarcasm was in the australian comment not the Latin part. The Latin comment was in if we where going to be so picky about languages being incorrect then British people should first start speaking latin as the primary language.

Jeff 05-02-2003 11:08 PM

I think there'd be less international confusion if we Americans undid all the stupid stuff into which Webster (God bless him) et al bilked our ancestors.

draygin 05-02-2003 11:23 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jeff
et al bilked our ancestors.
Is this a typo or some sort of proper wording that I've never heard of before? x.x


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 08:26 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright (C) 1998-2019 Toonslab All Rights Reserved.