Originally Posted by hunterhunk (Post 1658956)

You're seriously going to tell me p2ks sucked pre-nerf? hahahah don't make me laugh I promise I could've wiped you with p2ks and you could have used any gun. P2ks were extremely good IF USED CORRECTLY which none of the Era players really understand how to use them.

The guns are fine the way they are, they are in their correct tiers and the stats are fine.

Originally Posted by Rave_J (Post 1659015)

Heres a sulition
umm destory the trade system reopen the mall
and no drop trading or cant drop trade at all
u can just sell ur crap to other others at the mall

Originally Posted by TheLinkMan2002 (Post 1658953)

this has nothing to do with the tech9 or the scar anymore, i own neither. the argument is more for s6 and p2ks which are now on par with mp5.... for no reason. that's been my argument from the start, it has nothing to do with the fact that i owned tech9 i was using it as a basis for my argument. and like you said tech9 sucked pre nerf, well so did s6 and p2ks. what im simply stating is that these guns are now godly(ive used both) and if your argument is that the reason that they needed to be better because they werent on par with their rarity then why be better than the scar which is a better argument point. scar was better than both of these guns to begin with and is also much more rare and now both guns are better than scar. basically it makes no sense to change these guns the way they were changed. they should have stayed where they were at. and this is directed more towards rogue, atleast your counter argument made sense wil but i still believe a better approach would have been to release other weapons to fill those spots.

Originally Posted by Venom_Fish (Post 1659037)

.... Do you know how to read?
Rarity was one of the lowest contributing factors.
Ugh,
Re-read my initial response as many times as it takes, and it'll be a sufficient rebuddle for your first post as well as this one.
I really don't feel like repeating myself.
:\

Originally Posted by TheLinkMan2002 (Post 1659091)

you clearly didnt read what i said. my post was directed at rogue. i read yours after and then edited adding that your argument actually made sense