![]() |
Quote:
Those numbers are assuming that people bought the exact number of gelats that they spent on the shop. That probably isn't the case, I'd imagine. |
I don't really get the whole idea of a cash shop. Can someone please explain?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Ideally the items will be consumable or provide a bonus for a short while so that they can be sold to the same customers again and again and again. Like all those free korean mmos. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Classic servers don't have owners paying for them so it makes sense for the players to cover that cost. Tl;dr Paying to develop is just purely greedy double dipping. Also I still can't see micro transactions working if we still need to buy gelats first. Paying $30 for a bunch of gelats is NOT a micro transaction. The idea of micro payments is that paying $2 fifteen times seems like a lower cost than paying $30 all at once, and gelats remove a lot of the ease of what should be a very quick and very simple payment. |
Quote:
I don't know specifically how the iPhone/iPad/iPod one works exactly, but when I get e-mails from their customers who e-mail the wrong address about gelat packs, they get something like tiny bundles at such a measly and manageable price which, with the removal of subscriptions to be replaced with gelat shops, would probably end up mimicked here. For a bit of mathematics: With the cheapest subscription package at the moment (2400 gelats for 8 months gold charged at 300 per month, no bonus gelats added), that's around $33US total but just over $4US per month. Pay $4US and get 300 gelats to spend at these Gelat Shops and most wouldn't care about $4US off their backs. Much better than a huge chunk, that's for sure, which would make sense to be set at in these little packs compared to how they are now. Again, obviously can't speak on behalf of Unixmad. |
Quote:
They should be making it as quick and easy as possible to give them money. Gelats are just annoying. |
Quote:
|
It's most likely there so you've got situations like:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Another thing that I'd like to see is enforcing that the cash shop items be tradable. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
In a forum called "Your opinion" I'm going to hide my opinion with white font. Makes sense, no?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
All considered, I don't think there are any plans of doing a GraalOnline-wide removal of the subscription. If that were the plan, they'd have done it already. Compared to the Graal#### community, the Classic Subscription community is becoming a minority, slowly but surely. Though, not outnumbered by them yet, it is heading that way. No sense to be kicking the last of us in the gut years down the track with "We decided, it's time..." |
Quote:
|
Pardon me if I'm wrong, but I paid $50 for my account 8 years ago under the assumption that I would have a classic subscription for life. And if I am mistaken I bought my account under those terms.
Wouldn't it be illegal in some sense to revoke that? |
Quote:
Considering terms change you're probably also wrong about that aspect of it as well. |
Quote:
To get around it they would need to close Graal down and relaunch it with a new name, or just close down all of the classic servers (they couldn't just relabel them all as, say, "Silver Servers", because you could argue that it's a reasonable expectation that you'd still have access to servers that met the criteria of Classic servers back when you created your account). |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
i'd think f2p shouldn't be an option, but classic servers shouldn't be changed. unless they Have to change. . . The Classic / gold is a good thing though, especially with the development servers. That being said can't see how alot of the people who have grown up on this, or played it for more than 5 years are strictly against paying a few dollars to support the servers and further Development of Graal.. i can see y if u have a classic account. idk not really @ all though Quote:
Things have been this way for a very long time, while its fun while it lasts, people know change is long overdue. That the game: graal, Deserves Change. so i'm not saying everyone should be paying $ to play the game they love. Well I Am saying that. but what i'm really trying to say is idk why graal didn't blow up yet considering it's one of the 'Best Games' i've ever played, i'm sure most of the frequent players could concur ;]. More players to develop more servers more servers to develop more players. beget, beget, beget. I feel like Graal is at a tipping point and tuff decisions need to be made either way so I hope I don't cloud no ones judgment. I'm just trying to toss my 2 C at it u know. |
The 1, 3, 5 option is a good idea. Players will want to TRY the full benefits of GraalOnline (Gold) before auctually paying for a longer period of time. Making these options for PaybyCash users will let them have a fair deal on whether they want to keep playing the game or whatnot. The quality of the game is what will bring them towards the game and keep playing it therefore paying for a longer period of time. Also, if they were to purchase the 8 months option, and the player doesn't like the game, than they won't refer another friend to play the game and then so on and so forth. This is what makes the game grow more and more profitable.
|
Quote:
CJ is legally bound to continue to provide a service that they previously offered, that has been paid for. They can't revoke it unless as Demisis stated they do something that can break the contract. |
| All times are GMT +2. The time now is 08:24 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright (C) 1998-2019 Toonslab All Rights Reserved.